An aspect of our research experience that is worth addressing further is our utilization of a wiki throughout the project. We used a wiki as the primary means of collaboration with one other. The rationale for initially choosing to use a wiki has already been addressed within the Methodology section. The wiki was an extremely valuable tool. We were able to communicate more efficiently and effectively. For instance, we were also able to have multiple conversations at the same time and given our busy schedules, the wiki allowed us to "meet" online instead of meeting face-to-face. Using the wiki simplified our coding and interview process; this was a significant benefit as it saved much time and it streamlined the creation of our final product.
However, learning how to use the wiki was not an easy task for everyone. The idea of using the wiki came from a previous class assignment. We had used the wiki to collaborate about assessment policy. This previous experience made it easier to use the wiki for a second time. Despite some reservations of two of the group members, we decided to use the wiki because we could see the benefits of being able to collaborate online, and our third group member is a technology guru. With his help we were all able to use the website rather smoothly. He was able to take on the role of an effective mentor. He coached us by teaching us how to create pages, by navigating through the wiki, and by simply reassuring us when we "lost" our data. We realized that technology experts may have the expertise in the technology area but may not be able to effectively support others with their use of technology. Therefore, if a group is going use a new piece of technology, a person who is willing to support the learning of others must be present. Without our expert, we would have had a more frustrating experience, and probably would have opted not to use the wiki in the first place.
Our use of a wiki spurred the notion of using a wiki for induction implementation. With a wiki, a professional learning community based on induction can be created. The wiki removes the physical barriers of time and space. The collaborative creation of documents such as lesson plans, assignments, and rubrics can be changed, modified, or fixed by a beginning teacher's mentor or by a group of beginning teachers supporting one other. Better yet, a teacher at any stage in their career can use a wiki to gain the benefits of the back and forth feedback and commentary that a wiki can provide. In addition, with the use of a wiki, a beginning teacher can have the opportunity to mentor an experienced teacher who may not be confident with the use of technology.
Unfortunately, we feel that the disadvantages of using a wiki specifically for a mentoring or an induction initiative outweigh the advantages. The largest barrier is that a technology expert needs to be available. In the end, you cannot forgo the physical presence of a technology expert because it facilitates the smoother resolution of technological difficulties. Although using the wiki was an opportunity for us to learn something new, it took a lot of time. Unless all those involved already have experience in using technology, it might become more of a hindrance than an aid.
Reflections on the Use of a Wiki
An aspect of our research experience that is worth addressing further is our utilization of a wiki throughout the project. We used a wiki as the primary means of collaboration with one other. The rationale for initially choosing to use a wiki has already been addressed within the Methodology section. The wiki was an extremely valuable tool. We were able to communicate more efficiently and effectively. For instance, we were also able to have multiple conversations at the same time and given our busy schedules, the wiki allowed us to "meet" online instead of meeting face-to-face. Using the wiki simplified our coding and interview process; this was a significant benefit as it saved much time and it streamlined the creation of our final product.
However, learning how to use the wiki was not an easy task for everyone. The idea of using the wiki came from a previous class assignment. We had used the wiki to collaborate about assessment policy. This previous experience made it easier to use the wiki for a second time. Despite some reservations of two of the group members, we decided to use the wiki because we could see the benefits of being able to collaborate online, and our third group member is a technology guru. With his help we were all able to use the website rather smoothly. He was able to take on the role of an effective mentor. He coached us by teaching us how to create pages, by navigating through the wiki, and by simply reassuring us when we "lost" our data. We realized that technology experts may have the expertise in the technology area but may not be able to effectively support others with their use of technology. Therefore, if a group is going use a new piece of technology, a person who is willing to support the learning of others must be present. Without our expert, we would have had a more frustrating experience, and probably would have opted not to use the wiki in the first place.
Our use of a wiki spurred the notion of using a wiki for induction implementation. With a wiki, a professional learning community based on induction can be created. The wiki removes the physical barriers of time and space. The collaborative creation of documents such as lesson plans, assignments, and rubrics can be changed, modified, or fixed by a beginning teacher's mentor or by a group of beginning teachers supporting one other. Better yet, a teacher at any stage in their career can use a wiki to gain the benefits of the back and forth feedback and commentary that a wiki can provide. In addition, with the use of a wiki, a beginning teacher can have the opportunity to mentor an experienced teacher who may not be confident with the use of technology.
Unfortunately, we feel that the disadvantages of using a wiki specifically for a mentoring or an induction initiative outweigh the advantages. The largest barrier is that a technology expert needs to be available. In the end, you cannot forgo the physical presence of a technology expert because it facilitates the smoother resolution of technological difficulties. Although using the wiki was an opportunity for us to learn something new, it took a lot of time. Unless all those involved already have experience in using technology, it might become more of a hindrance than an aid.